<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cloverfield sequel in the works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:31:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Plus1</title>
		<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Plus1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=269#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Cloverfield had a great marketing campaign that gave it a cool feel for a movie. However the execution of the movie was off by a long mile. For the record &quot;Blair Witch Project&quot; was a horrible movie and why anyone would copy that formula is beyond me. Cloverfield should have been shot as a movie and not a &quot;my first video&quot; project. Again, the concept was great but the execution fell flat.

As for a sequel. If they make it a movie and not an exact copy but from a different point of view then it may be good. But if they just rehash the concept from the first movie it will be a bomb bigger then the one that was dropped on Godzilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloverfield had a great marketing campaign that gave it a cool feel for a movie. However the execution of the movie was off by a long mile. For the record &#8220;Blair Witch Project&#8221; was a horrible movie and why anyone would copy that formula is beyond me. Cloverfield should have been shot as a movie and not a &#8220;my first video&#8221; project. Again, the concept was great but the execution fell flat.</p>
<p>As for a sequel. If they make it a movie and not an exact copy but from a different point of view then it may be good. But if they just rehash the concept from the first movie it will be a bomb bigger then the one that was dropped on Godzilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan-Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan-Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=269#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Personally, I didnt like Cloverfield, but I feel that a sequel would be very appropriate. Cloverfield was just like a taste, an hour and a half long preview if you will. 

Perhaps the sequel will be an actual movie not just a load of crap thrown together, with nicely funded viral marketing campaign pushing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I didnt like Cloverfield, but I feel that a sequel would be very appropriate. Cloverfield was just like a taste, an hour and a half long preview if you will. </p>
<p>Perhaps the sequel will be an actual movie not just a load of crap thrown together, with nicely funded viral marketing campaign pushing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
