<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Cloverfield sequel in the works?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Plus1</title><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/#comment-1411</link> <dc:creator>Plus1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=269#comment-1411</guid> <description>Cloverfield had a great marketing campaign that gave it a cool feel for a movie. However the execution of the movie was off by a long mile. For the record &quot;Blair Witch Project&quot; was a horrible movie and why anyone would copy that formula is beyond me. Cloverfield should have been shot as a movie and not a &quot;my first video&quot; project. Again, the concept was great but the execution fell flat.As for a sequel. If they make it a movie and not an exact copy but from a different point of view then it may be good. But if they just rehash the concept from the first movie it will be a bomb bigger then the one that was dropped on Godzilla.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloverfield had a great marketing campaign that gave it a cool feel for a movie. However the execution of the movie was off by a long mile. For the record &#8220;Blair Witch Project&#8221; was a horrible movie and why anyone would copy that formula is beyond me. Cloverfield should have been shot as a movie and not a &#8220;my first video&#8221; project. Again, the concept was great but the execution fell flat.</p><p>As for a sequel. If they make it a movie and not an exact copy but from a different point of view then it may be good. But if they just rehash the concept from the first movie it will be a bomb bigger then the one that was dropped on Godzilla.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stan-Lee</title><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/#comment-1390</link> <dc:creator>Stan-Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=269#comment-1390</guid> <description>Personally, I didnt like Cloverfield, but I feel that a sequel would be very appropriate. Cloverfield was just like a taste, an hour and a half long preview if you will.Perhaps the sequel will be an actual movie not just a load of crap thrown together, with nicely funded viral marketing campaign pushing it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I didnt like Cloverfield, but I feel that a sequel would be very appropriate. Cloverfield was just like a taste, an hour and a half long preview if you will.</p><p>Perhaps the sequel will be an actual movie not just a load of crap thrown together, with nicely funded viral marketing campaign pushing it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 245/246 objects using disk

Served from: www.atomicpopcorn.net @ 2012-02-10 16:21:32 -->
