Follow Us on Facebook
Follow Us on Twitter
Daily Emails from AP
RSS Feed of AP
Baltimore Screenings

Bruno Review

Throughout Bruno, one wonders if the point of the film is for Sacha Baron Cohen to try too hard. He might have been with his previous effort Borat, with the difference being that film felt natural. That’s not to say Baron Cohen’s latest venture doesn’t as it’s amazing he pulled so many people in on the joke. Yet parts of it feel too scripted or that Sacha feels the need to top what he did before. Being fair, it was easier to accomplish this the first time around before Borat took the world by storm. While that movie poked fun at how inept foreigners are to our country, Bruno is a pure mockery of religion and people’s perception of homosexuals in general.

BRU_Teaser1-Sheet_14F (Page 1)Baron Cohen does what he does best and becomes Bruno, giving him a solid back story and transforming himself. It doesn’t need to be stated, but one believes this guy actually exists. It’s a tougher sale than Borat, obviously, but Baron Cohen makes it all gel together nicely. Essentially they’re both the same character as both are obnoxious and loud with one being gay and the other being a foreigner. Both films do share similar structure as it begins with the back story, then why the lead has to come to America, and the crazy shenanigans each gets in to. Where they differ is how each goes about getting the shock value. Here, Bruno is more about offending people by being the biggest homosexual on the planet and often times, it’s offensively hilarious.

The best, and funniest, bit happens when Bruno visits a preacher in Alabama to turn him straight. Many times the preacher mentions Jesus only to prompt Bruno to make comments about the preacher possibly being gay. The hilarity is intercut with Bruno going to boot camp to give the army a different flavor. It does border on being juvenile, but it’s forgivable given how funny the act is. Of course, he does go for the shock value and it works when he’s interviewing Paula Abdul to film his potential new show. Unfortunately, the furniture hasn’t come in and Bruno has to use the pool guys as furniture and as a cart for food, only to cause Paula to walk out. He also manages to grab a short interview with Harrison Ford that’s purely priceless. Bruno doesn’t quit there with being hilarious, as his interaction with a terrorist leader should make one howl. Then there’s the end of the picture that uses “My Heart Will Go On” better than James Cameron’s opus did. It’s certainly a lot funnier placement.

Yet it’s the moments when the film tries too hard that hurt it. The most prominent thing in the trailers involves the African baby and while it is funny, it isn’t as creative as things that come earlier and later in the film. Actually, it has nothing to do with the scenes being in the trailer rather than the general sense that Baron Cohen is trying too hard to drive the point home. Even at times you can tell this is the intent by the tone of his voice as he narrates. The feeling is also felt when Bruno mispronounces the names of potential guests onto his show to his assistant, Lutz. It’s also these moments that come off as scripted rather than natural. In going too far with some of these skits, Baron Cohen and director Larry Charles sacrifice the plausibility that strongly helped Borat be so hysterical. In addition, this one has a hard time keeping up the stream of gut-bustingly funny adventures that Borat was able to do so well.

Bruno accomplishes what it sets out to do and is often times a riot, even with two ramped up, and hilarious gay sex scenes. However this looks to be the last time he could pull this shtick off as he gave Borat enough time to blow over only to give another go at it. Likely, it will be next to impossible to pull this off for a third time. For this effort though, Sacha Baron Cohen turns in another hilarious time even if it can’t quite give enough hilarity as he did with the first film. Bruno’s an offensive, gross, and outright hysterical time at the movies that should piss off most devout religious folk. Bravo.

 ★★★½☆ 

  • Jonathan F
    What a horribly written piece of shit. First of all Borat was about pointing out racism and intolerance in this country not about stupid inept foreigners. Then you mention Bruno being an attack on religion but never follow up this claim leading me to believe you are once again terribly mistaken.

    Please do us all a favor and put an end to your misinformed nonsense. Stop fucking writing.
  • Philip Barrett
    Did you see the movie? Bruno is everything religion hates. Borat, the character, pokes fun at inept foreigners.
  • Jonathan F
    Yes. I am aware that is what you seem to think. Just because a lot of christian institutions are against homosexuals doesn't mean the point of Bruno is to mock religion. Borat is not poking fun at inept foreigners, he is poking fun at stupid people like you. Did you just defend yourself there? It looks to me as if you just repeated what you said in the review. You are still wrong.
  • Philip Barrett
    But it DOES mock religion in the scene with him going to two pastors to try to become straight. Oh, and let's not forget the picture of the black baby.

    The point of the film is to mock everyone, religion just happens to be the one he mocks quite a bit in it.

    My question is why are you reading my stuff if you think it's so poorly written?
  • Jonathan F
    Because it is the movie review equivalent of slowing down on the freeway when you see an accident.
  • Jon
    No, Philip has a great point. Of course, due to the nature of Bruno's creation as a gay character, Cohen would go after Muslims and Christians who despise gays as much as Republicans. It was the most organic thing for Cohen to do. Why? He was commenting on bigotry. The overall themes of both Borat and Bruno. So one cannot be mad if a reviewer takes note. Religion is attacked in various scenes, and whether it is right or wrong, it's good that he did.
  • Jonathan F
    But that is just the problem. Philip didn't make that point. He called the movie a "pure" mockery of religion, implying that was the entire goal of the movie.

    When clearly the movie is trying to expose bigotry in all facets of society. The point you made is correct Jon, unfortunately Philip didn't make the same point or at least if he did, he presented it poorly in his writing.
  • Erik Buckman
    I'm with Philip that 'Bruno' is best when it is toned down.

    Political commentary aside, the jokes and imagery that are sold as “shocking” (and most are) become annoying after the first 30 minutes. 'Bruno' shines when the “shock” takes a backseat. It’s during the more subtle moments of the film where 'Bruno' becomes authentically funny.
  • Ted Lasky
    This was the worst film in the history of film making. It was simply an outlandish pornography with touches of real humor.

    Judicious and repetitious viewing of this film, would make any Al-Qaeda prisoner commit suicide.

    I saw Borat, and I liked most of it, finding only small parts offensive. This movie would be offensive to all but the most immature on the planet.

    If you've seen the trailer...consider yourself having saved $10, and having seen the best parts of the movie.
  • Jon
    Really? Because if I was a captive and they showed me, say "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians", "Paul Blart: Mall Cop", or any Uwe Boll pics, I would shoot myself. Bruno is hilarious and proud to be offensive. Obviously, that wasn't up your alley.

    Best parts are not in the trailer, by the way.
  • Philip Barrett
    Edited to reflect what I was trying to get at a little better. Shame I had to dumb down my review for certain people. :P
  • molly
    Bruno was a filthy, painful waste of time.

    I cannot believe I was stupid enough to not read a review about it first. It was 60 minutes of vile filth, abhorrently offensive, brainless: a waste of $17. If CHILD ABUSE offends you, if graphic HOMOSEXUAL PORNOGRAPHY offends you (just a straight porn would offend someone - no Im not homophobic) and If watching real COUPLES Have SEX and S&M scenes offends you(although some may be turned on by this), and RELIGIOUS VILIFICATION and RACISM offends you, then PLEASE DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE.

    Little Britain was funny, Summer Heights High was funny, We Can Be Heroes is funny.... This is NOT. For me who has a high tolerance to "unique" movies, and I "get satire", in fact i love it. But I found this INHUMANE and PUTRID. It was an ASSAULT to my senses, my ears and my eyes.

    To see a "Black Baby" by the name of "OJ", being crucified on a cross, and a penis that fills the screen. Shame on the musos (Bono??) at the end who supported the Cruelty, Ignorance and Hate in this movie. It is very sad that it relies on extreme antics. This movie is all about bad values. This movie will do nothing to win points for the Gays, and this was part of the movies intention. Simply a painful,vomitous extension of "Jackass:The Movie" - nothing original at all.

    Yes I "get it", No it is not right: BOYCOTT BRUNO.
  • I've got to agree with Jonathan on the religion thing. While there were a few scenes focused around religious figures, I do not believe that the film itself was a social commentary on religion.

    To get my full take, check out my review of 'Bruno' at:

    http://thequintessentialgeneralist.wordpress.co...
  • Philip Barrett
    It may not have been, but it does mock religion and it's perception of homosexuals. That's the point I was trying to make.
blog comments powered by Disqus