<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash of Genius Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/flash-of-genius-movie-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/flash-of-genius-movie-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:31:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/flash-of-genius-movie-review/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=1220#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>The jury found that Ford did not *willfully* infringe on Kearns&#039; patent. That is to say, they didn&#039;t believe that the company maliciously tried to dupe him. This sort of thing happens in patent cases all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jury found that Ford did not *willfully* infringe on Kearns&#8217; patent. That is to say, they didn&#8217;t believe that the company maliciously tried to dupe him. This sort of thing happens in patent cases all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren brooker</title>
		<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/flash-of-genius-movie-review/#comment-2942</link>
		<dc:creator>warren brooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=1220#comment-2942</guid>
		<description>if the jury believed robert kearns then why shouldn&#039;t we ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the jury believed robert kearns then why shouldn&#8217;t we ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/flash-of-genius-movie-review/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=1220#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>Actually, major automakers were already using or investigating intermittent windshield wipers before Bob Kearns presented his ideas. For a more true-to-life timeline than Hollywood is presenting, you might want to take a look at: http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/technology/#flash-of-genius

Scott Monty
Global Digital Communications
Ford Motor Company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, major automakers were already using or investigating intermittent windshield wipers before Bob Kearns presented his ideas. For a more true-to-life timeline than Hollywood is presenting, you might want to take a look at: <a href="http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/technology/#flash-of-genius" rel="nofollow">http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/technology/#flash-of-genius</a></p>
<p>Scott Monty<br />
Global Digital Communications<br />
Ford Motor Company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
