Knowing Movie Review

Short of it: Something Proyas has done has struck a chord and changed the action genre for the better. There are ups and downs, along with some extraordinary questions asked throughout, equaling a very solid film.

I must admit that, going into this movie, I was hoping for something different from Alex Proyas, the famed director of The Crow and Dark City, and something different is what I got! A whirlwind of devastation, spookiness, and downright “huh?” What more could you ask for?

Knowing Movie Review

Knowing Movie Review

The story follows John (Nicolas Cage) and his son Caleb, who attend a 50-year-anniversary unveiling of a time capsule at Caleb’s school. With the unveiling, Caleb receives an envelope containing a letter full of seemingly random numbers scribbled front and back.

John, an astrophysicist and recent widower, is doing his best to take care of Caleb after the freak accident that took his wife a year ago. The family storyline is woven throughout the film in intricate detail. Questions of life, and what lies beyond, surface pretty quickly and hit hard throughout.

Following the discovery of this random numbered note, John discovers a pattern, one that may come off a bit on the crazy side. The pattern shows him all of the major disasters and the deaths involved since 1948 in chronological order. Something that is hard to believe but soon to be proven by the next numbers in sequence. Soon we meet the “whisper people” who follow Caleb around whispering in his head – as they did the little girl who originally wrote the numbers down. Spooky, freaky, downright creepy – that’s how I would describe how Proyas put these “people” into the storyline.

Proyas does a solid job of making us really feel for the cast on many different levels. The inevitable questions of life after death, spirituality, and many others pop up all over this film. He really made me think during this movie, not something I admittedly enjoy during most action films. The way he intertwined questions, reasoning and life was done very well.

The look and the feel of the film was pretty darn real throughout up till the end of the film. I will not spoil anything for you although I sit here thinking “I need someone to spill the beans to!”.

Overall, the movie was a thought-provoking action movie. With twists and turns around almost every corner, Proyas really gave us something different than the norm. I would recommend this one as a rental as it’s not so much a “theater” film. My wife, who rarely follows me to films said this about it: “If I were to go to the bathroom midway through the movie and come back in for the end, I would wonder if I had gone into a different theater”. Take it at face value but there is some truth to it. The beginning and end don’t necessary match up.

 ★★★☆☆ 



  • The Reverent One
    This movie is pure genius and any Christian who thinks that it is a bad thing should rethink their position. Just think how many movies are out there that glorify sin. Specifically, money, drugs, sex, etc. without any hint whatsoever of spiritual principles and moral values. You see, I believe this film's 'target' audience is not those like you and me who already believe. The people who created this thing are truly enlightened and understand what it means to be a fisher of men in today's world. This medium of modern-day technology just happens to be their fishing-rod. They realize that they have to be subtle in order to not shut people down from recieving the message. They have successfully warmed peoples imaginations toward their Source, and stirred these peoples hearts so that they might acquire a seeker's mindset.This film even has "Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life" planted in it on the side of truck toward the very end.This film is actually radical evangelism at it's best!
  • Greg
    Reverent One,

    I totally disagree with you. As a Christian, I found this film to be propaganda for naturalism. For example, the aliens were given the power of omniscience (they whispered to the girl future events), and the end scene in "the garden of Eden" communicated to me the theory that things started on earth in a similar way...beings were planted here by aliens. Aliens are the savior in this movie, not God. I'm surprised no attempt was made to explain John's insights of Revelation as something received by aliens. In this day and age, you can't be subtle about the Christian message. If Jesus is the Way, don't make aliens the hero.
  • Some very valid points Greg.
  • Gail
    I thought the ones you labeled as aliens were revealed or at least hinted to be angels when they ascended the lines used were clearly wing shaped or inspired. Did anyone else think that?
  • Greg
    True, but why did they have to travel in a space ship if they were angels? Again, the way I interpreted that was angelic spirit beings described in the Bible are really highly evolved creatures. More propaganda for naturalism. The idea would be that the writers of the Bible saw or were given visions of "angelic looking aliens" and misinterpreted them as being "spirits".
  • Edwin
    Ok number one: you drive an iteresting point. I agree with you except that the reason the aliens or 'angels' as they have been referred as, did not use holy methods of transportation, is that humans are mostly impure and the children, though referred to as pure in Christianity, would have by laws of science, would have had their skin and other ripped off clean from their bones. Eh drives an extremely good point as well. Note: if i have left anything out please excuse me im only 13 and trying to write on a laptop not worth a lump of s**t.

    Feel free to email me and discuss further.
  • Greg
    Edwin, I'm not following but would like to. More?
  • Erik
    The whole charm of the film is the naturalism vs. religion ambiguity, why fight it?
  • Erik
    This film deserves at least a B. The thing is, I can't get it out of my head. I've seen it three times. There are moments when I want to bump it up to an A-. Other times, I can poke a few holes in it. Still, my rating never gets lower than a B. Therefore, I think the critics mostly got this one wrong. The plot is mostly solid and the two major flaws I found could have been easily avoided. First, at the very beginning, the scene suggests that the children haven't been exposed to the idea of a time capsule--otherwise, why would the kid ask what it is--yet Lucinda came up with the idea of drawing pictures about the future. We are lead to believe that the school voted on the best idea among the children--draw the pictures--the previous day and that the capsule will be placed underground the next day, and that the two ideas dovetailed perfectly. Clearly Lucinda could not have come up with the idea of placing the pictures in the time capsule, because for that to happen she would have had to already be exposed to the idea the a capsule was planned. If she had been exposed to the idea of the time capsule, why wouldn't the other children? Did I miss something or is this completely incoherent? Second, the female lead happens to get an ambulance when all hell is breaking loose. We can even see fires breaking out in the distance. How likely is that? Don't police and rescue service have something better to do when all hell is breaking loose? Granted, the public announcement was only recently made, but it still seems mundanely implausible. Also, it's not necessary for advancing the plot. There are also four lines that stick out as weak. First, when he's first figuring out what the numbers mean, Koestler says, "What's going on here?" Lame. The preceding "Come on!" is believable, but the subsequent "What's going on here?" is weak and unnecessary. Second, Koestler yells "Hey!" at a burning man. Lame. Third, Koestler's MIT colleague says "You were there?" when he gets out of the car. Lame. Fourth, Koestler says the line about seeing the burning faces. You could blame this one on Cage's acting, but the line itself is not great. These weak lines are not far from each other, makes me wonder if it was the same writer. Three more very minor nitpicks: First, when Koestler is figuring out the numbers, wouldn't he at least get 9-11 right off the bat, if not 9-11-01? He didn't need to write those dividing lines completely wrong the first time. Second, the burning moose wasn't that great of CGI. The several animals that followed were good. Third, did Koestler really need to see his colleague and his wife in midst of chaos? It's a big city. Granted, this is more cinematic poetry than reality, but I think it was unnecessary. We were already done with him when he was left helpless at Koestler's desk. Other than the above, I cannot find any major flaws in the film. The editing is rather tight and all scenes are in the service of advancing the plot. There is plenty of foreshadowing and handholding here to carry you through. It's a good film.
  • Rosemarie
    Hey Edwin, really cool review for your age and crappy laptop. The film has a lot of flaws, but was really compelling in the first half, then got weird with aliens (?). I really felt sad that the father could not go with Caleb. And the ending really suggested the garden of Eden with a male and female and the tree of knowledge (?). The ending doesn't seem like the Rapture or Armageddon, but suggets it a little. BTW, Isn't Caleb a Biblical name? Wonder if that could be a reference to the Bible. Anyway, I enjoy the discussion.
  • Marian
    Edwin is right: maybe angels can travel without vehicles capable of preserving life, but not the kids. Erik, Lucinda probably suggested the time capsule because of the voices telling her what to do and the numbers. The ambulance crew did not even turn around when the police guy shot in the air, which was weird; good one with them being there at that time, but maybe they just happened to be there on the way to or from somewhere else. When Koestler was figuring out the numbers, he was kind of drunk already and he did not know he was looking at the date yet. It feels ok to me, just maybe very improbable to find 9/11, but the whole movie is about coincidences. The other points you make are pretty good. Nice!
  • Jose
    Wouldn't that be a likely possiblity? How else could they have descibed something they never saw? When Columbus arrived in America he thought the natives were Indians and thus, the natives thought they were gods...until they started getting slaughtered. But how else would someone, thousands of years ago, describe something like that other than "spiritual". It is not unlikely that we've been wrong all along and that indeed, the "all mighty" will return and save those that deserve to be saved.
  • Joe
    Yes, I thought the same thing. I think the message is that God is simply mans explanations for something bigger than him/herself. Much like the new civilization that is going to be created. How will they explain their origins? Something simple that people will buy and not question.
  • DiamondCheniere
    I agree with you to a certain point. The "Whisper People" are not aliens, but that of Angels. During the last few minutes of the movie when Caleb was chosen to go, their body turned back to dust or evaporated, and the image you saw appeared to be aliens but were actually angels; you can tell when they turn to the side and you see an "image" of the wings. It made sense because the Bible says in Hebrews that we may entertain angels unaware. Which means they can appear as everyday people, but are actually not...
    I enjoyed this movie.....
  • Sir
    You don't even know what or who GOD is... Loose the arrogance and forget what you have been taught!
  • Veruca
    And how do you know that GOD isn't an Alien???
    for me honestly ... Alien or superhuman being are the same...and super human being is GOD for me...
    open your eyes guys ... read the story of the prophets and the bible! look on their pictures maybe u can understand, dig people.. and btw look on the NASA site too... we are approaching the maximum sunspot by 2011...
  • Jose
    This movie explores the likely possibility that yes, we were placed in this world by a power and knowledge greater than our own, being god or alien. secondly it is likely that over thousands of years of man kinds existance humans have painted their own interpretation of a superior being as God when in reality god and its heavenly angels are truly an advance civilization...That is more likely to be possible than the existance of God. Take a look at the ending of the movie, as the kids rise with the "aliens" there are angle type wings on their backs. Who is to say that God and angels are to appear out of the clouds as portreyd by Michael Angelo? In the past and until this day that has been the image painted by all who portray the coming of God, but is it an accurate portreyal or simply the only way to describe what is unexplainable? Until that day comes, we will never know.
  • As a Pantheist, I'm going to have to say that this film has very little to do with Naturalism at all, it is very clearly a Scientology movie. Why? Because of the imagery of religions used throughout the movie vs science. It seemed that the whole movie was bent on debunking world religions (mainly Christianity but not the only one) in favor of the belief that what we think of as 'God' are an alien civilization and angels are these aliens and we as humans are their pets. God in the Christian belief think of us as his children and will save us, maybe not all but most. Scientology is a lot more discriminate and only a select few strong believers or listeners can be saved by these alien god-like beings.

    Personally I enjoyed most of the movie until close to the end when they realized they needed to go back to Lucinda's trailer. THEN I thought it got really distasteful and basically preached that religions are wrong and our souls and being belong to a more advanced race of aliens, who will pick a very select few who goes and place us into a whole new planet where we can start this whole stupid cycle all over again like good little science experiments. Blah! Is what I say to that.
  • eh
    eh...
    u know when they go to the dead woman's house with their children and find out that EE means everyone else? There was a picture with a being with 4 animal heads and a person in the sky? That's a reference from the book of Ezekiel in the Bible. I'm assuming that the so called "aliens" that you are all talking about are the angels with the 4 animal heads. hence there were 4 beings that took the children to some where. That whole space ship looking thing was probably brought in to make it look more factual rather than having angels just magically teleporting them off to somewhere. If you look up any books about the book of Ezekiel, you will absolutely find old pictures of what people thought it would have looked like as it described in the Bible. The whole big ass rotating space ship thing that you see in the movie looks like the pictures shown in some books about the book of Ezekiel. seriously, who cares if this is a propaganda for naturalism or for christians? just like the protagonist said, believe what you want to believe. Its just a movie, interpret it the way you want to see it as, thats all you gota do...
  • Greg
    EH,

    I agree with you for the most part, but "The Reverent One" above said the "people who created this thing are truly enlightened and understand what it means to be a fisher of men in today’s world." I was challenging this viewpoint. I would not, as a Christian, use this film to promote Christianity, so it's in this context I wrote what I did.
  • syllia
    first off i would like to say i respect your opinion however,i think you are not paying attention to the real detail in this film....the aliens represent angels..keep in mind there is certain guide lines film makers must follow...So they create metaphors i totally agree with The Reverent One ...as a christian we should be thankful for a movie like this and hope it opens the eyes of those that need it!!!
  • Daniel Tinneny
    Now i cant even enjoy a movie without these crazy GOD people ruining it...IMAGINE ALL THE PEOPLEEEEE
  • Its a bummer that people feel that way, especially on a forum where you can't really interact with them. You can enjoy the movie without anyone ruining anything for you. And why would the people be crazy due to the fact they have faith in something?

    Seems very shallow and not very well thought out.
  • Katie
    If you want to enjoy a movie without people "ruining it for you" then why are you reading the post on here? Your "crazy God people" comment is a ignorant thing to say, you go ahead and live your empty life is you want to....I won't call you crazy. They do make a referance to purpose in the movie when Cage's character is teaching his class...did you catch that?
  • servantseer
    DITTO!
  • Renee
    Is it possible for you to review a movie without preaching???
  • review me this
    lol u are all so arrogant! we have made like 5 billion years without the world exploding, why is it supposed to explode now? oh, i know why! because we just barely have the technology to see the world and how we are affecting it! before Al Gore showed us all our effects on the earth we were living exactly like we are now! yes we shood start taking care of our earth and we should start making peace instead of war, but i think we shud spend more time on what takes up our world, like the people who dont have homes or food, instead of spending all of our money on a world filled with homeless people! EVERYONE ON HERE CAN GO POOP ON THEIR MOMS!
  • God's Gratious Gift
    Fantastic Reverent!!!!!! Amazing that there are the few of us who can see the movie in that way!!!!
  • Josh Wahlberg
    The Knowing is a profoundly moving story. Alex Proyas intrigues and elicits with intelligence, always keeping us guessing, luring us to follow his direction down a path to Hell itself. Forever a fan of Nicolas Cage whose sincere performances mirror the real world so closely, compelling you to believe. Love to see Proyas and Cage team again in making a science/action film that is both thought provoking and entertaining. I suggest converting the best selling novel, Sunstroke by David Kagan into a Blockbuster movie. Sunstroke has all the elements for a great motion picture: true science horror, a political conspiracy, real-people characterization and an End of the World Crisis that only one person can stop.
  • Nathan
    This movie was most deffinantly the best movies I have seen in my life, simply because someone in hollywood took a radical stand. I loved this movie soo much. The reverent one is toatally right. People that dont understand the movie need to understand God first. Best movie in the world , evangelism at its finest!!!
  • Wow that is heck of a response. "The best movie you have seen in your life"?
    Wow I thought it was okay, but even as a person who reads the bible, I didn't think it was a fabulous way to evangalize to folks. Most people in the world haven't even read Ezekial 1 prior to this.

    A ending that stayed true to Ezekial 1 BUT also very Hollywood if you ask me.
  • Gail
    I agree re the Ezekiel sourcing.... convenient for Hollywood.
  • JaneDoe
    You gotta be kidding me? Best movie in YOUR life perhaps which doesn't say much for the movies you have seen. This movie had real potential but the ending is just simply dumb. I mean what was the point of it all? If I wanted to know the 10 best ways to kill our planet I can just as well watch the Discovery Channel. Additionally, this whole alien thing was just pure crap. The movie's writers have the imagination of an eggplant. Aliens know the future, whisper it to kids, and act like some creepy perverts looking through bedroom windows at night ?!?! Once again, you gotta be kidding me!
  • Earthmath
    Ok now you've got a point there but if you really want to enjoy the movie which I'm guessing you didn't. You have to read between the lines. There is a message for those who believe but there is also what we know and love which is Science Fiction in it. Now about the Hollywood writers Eggplants imagination, that was just rude. First of all tell me how many apocalyptic movies say that world will end but take a twist and say something like we have gotten a second chance. Now that's crap for what I know. I've been waiting to see a movie that really show the planet been destroyed and this is definitely it.
  • Earthmath
    Also you've got to give Hollywood a brake you might not have gotten the movie script on you but hey!!!!! Hollywood shows what people want to see. They tell people what they want to know. Its just that the world is full of crap that we now believe in every single little thing that comes out of a monitor and by that I mean Cell Phones, Theaters, TVs, radios, even this computer you're using is full of things that will entertain you and brain wash you with stuff that you want to know about. Admit it!!!!! This movie shows us how unprepared we are for a global disaster. Let me ask you do you believe in the 2012 prophecy? Its not religious belief its world wide prophecies. Will we be ready if it really happens? But again like the guy in the movie, you wont believe in my words until it happens, only then will you change your perspective but it will be too late. LOL Sorry I guess I got a little preachy there on the last thing but I meant all of it.
  • janedoe
    I did not see any religious aspects in this movie. If you are talking about the end of the world as being a purely religious aspect, well that's your view. I do agree that it was different to have a movie with a big kaboom ending, which is rare, but the whole aliens thing really derailed the story for me. I would have inserted either some age old prophecy angle or ultra science like multiverses but not aliens creeping out little kids at night. As for 2012, I do not subscribe to the mumbo jumbo doom predictions. Just like a didn't think my toaster was going to wake up and attack me on midnight 2000. Like in the movie, people are not ready for a global disaster and I do not think that they will be ready for a long time to come but saying that I will believe in these prophecies when they finally happen is like saying the world will end on a Tuesday. Of course the world will eventually end and maybe it will happen on a Tuesday and I am sure a bunch of people will say I told you so and maybe it will be in the year 5823.
  • If you were to follow the movie as well as you could of, Ezekial 1, named in the movie, WAS the end of the movie. So for you to say that shows your lack of observation in the film itself.
    By no means did I recognize it as much as I did AFTER I re-read Ezekial 1, but it is straight from the bible. To call that a lack of religious aspects is wrong.
  • Erik
    I agree with AtomicPopcorn. The religious aspect of the film is clearly there. Koestler's father is a priest, his sister a believer, the aliens have wings, and there are biblical references to Corinthians and Ezekiel. I'm not even Christian, but I picked up on it. Still, I liked the film precisely because it begs the question: where does sci-fi end and spiritual fantasy begin?
  • janet
    i agree
    it was good until the end
    it left many questions unanswered
    pretty ridiculous ending.
  • DiamondCheniere
    I have to say that your response is actually simple and rather "dumb". The next time you dust off your bible, be sure and read 2 Peter 3:6-7. It explains that the world won't be destroyed by water (the days of Noah) but by fire. That aspect of the movie is true; I can't say how it will come true, but it is true how the earth will be destroyed. Children are innocent in the eyes of Christ and they are suppose to be taught by their parents right from wrong. So, the parents are responsible. In this film, his son believed, he didn't; which is why he was left behind. You can see his struggle with the truth when talking to his father. It all makes sense....if you know the Bible that is. ..
  • Erik
    Diamond, I think your application of the rapture is too simplistic. Why wasn't Koestler's father or sister saved? They were believers. I don't think this film is intended to resolve the question of whether they are aliens or angels. Is this a spiritual journey or sci-fi?
  • DiamondCheniere
    In the Bible, it states some will be taken and some will be left behind. I guess they used the aliens to keep down confusion for those that are atheist. The least little thing about God sets them off...
  • Katie
    The rapture is made up propaganda by the church. Look I believe in God but we will not get off that easy.
  • Laura
    the firealarm went off with about 5 minutes left of the movie, what happened to Nicolas Cages's character?
  • Nick Cage
    Knowing was absolutely RUBBISH.

    Saw it this evening and it was certainly the worst effort I have seen in the last 5 years. DREADFUL.

    The acting was absolutely awful. Cage is usually great but here he is embarrassing - when he drops to his knees in front of the space ship he looked like an idiot.

    The editing was also dreadful.
    Hollywood garbage pure and simple.
  • Nick Cage
    The script was also CORNY, CORNY, CORNY.

    Wooden acting and the boy was badly cast ..... could not act for toffee.

    Cage has done 2 pig movies now - Knowing and the Wickerman. Poor sod.

    Thank God it only cost £6 for the ticket. The popcorn was ok though.
  • I thought it was an interesting movie though nothing we haven't seen before in Hollywood. The way it was depicted was open to interpretation - think those make for good discussion. I didn't feel a sense of explanation or further closure to Nick Cage's character and his belief system (if any), thought that needed to be explored further. It was an ok movie - one I'm glad to have seen.
  • Michael
    I am surprised at such differing opinions on this movie. Personally, I thought it was excellent and very thought provoking. But I respect those who think otherwise.

    I will add my two cents about the aliens versus angels issue and the naturalism versus Christianity topic...

    To me, it seemed clear that the "whisperers" were angels. I thought that from the first moment they appeared in the movie as men. There are many references in scripture of angels appearing sometimes as men. And there are, likewise, many references to them being fearful creatures that strike terror (note the scene where the Nicholas Cage character chased the angel into the woods and what happened when the angel/man opened his mouth). They have also been referred to as creatures of light. What many have described as aliens in the film, I saw as such "creatures of light". And they very clearly had wings (though not in a child like fairy tale fashion). And personally, I do not find the "space ship" vehicles to be in conflict with this. After all, if the "angels" were removing the two children and all the paired animals to another planet, would they not need some kind of vehicle with which to do so (rather than simply spiritually teleporting them)?

    As for the larger issue of whether or the film was a religious message or some kind of naturalism propaganda, I think the reality is that it was neither. Take a look at an interview of the movie's author, Ryne Pearson: http://www.christiancinema.com/catalog/newsdesk... . Pearson happens to be a devout Catholic. Yet, by his own account, he did not intend for his movie script to be religious, per say. He did, however, intend to evoke thought about the issue of "Is there something after this?". And speaking of the movie's director, Alex Proyas, Pearson says, "he's not creating a message movie, he's leaving it to interpretation. He's giving you the playing field and you take away what you want from it, which I think is absolutely brilliant." (Maybe this is why there are such opposing viewpoints on this movie.)

    Yes, I would have liked to see a more specific reference to God and Jesus as they relate to end of times prophesy and the salvation of mankind. But, as Pearson said, he was not intending to write a script that was specifically religious.

    In my opinion, a movie is a good one when it is thought provoking and when those thoughts stick with you long after the movie. For me, this movie did both.
  • servantseer
    Reverent One,
    DITTO... In order to effectively reach your audience, one must speak from the perspective or position of the hearer without compromising TRUTH.
  • Vergil_Sparda's Son...
    ATTENTION/NOTE: Apparently, I can see most try to interpret what this movie is truly about. Let me tell you THIS... Something WILL happen in 2012, and not only one event. I can give a small list of events, and here it is: Galactic Alignment/DNA Ascension, Planet's Poles' Shifting, Planet X/ Planet Nibiru, Comet (not likely), Pleiadian or Reptilian race shall come down (possibly both), Project BlueBeam H A A R P, Planetary Alignment again (Rays from the Center of the Milky Way). I'll tell you what... If you have NOT done ANY research, WHATsoever, on any of those topics, then I suggest you DO. Especially before making comments. You totally have it all wrong. Misconception and Misinterpretation are only the first steps towards learning from your mistakes. Let me say... You all remember at the end with the 4-5 guys in black, with BLONDE hair, when they came to pick up the children?! Those were NOT angels, and seeing as to how oblivious you were to an obvious, veridical palpability, I can see it would be impossible to change those "inscrutable," incorrigible minds of yours. Before you petulantly judge my NON-"Theoretical" allegations, I suggest, once again... you do the research.

    I shall explain about your "aliens." Oh, yeah... Stop using the "A" word, because it's offensive to outsiders. No, I'm not some insane conspiracy theory guy, before you attempt to think that, without any relevant evidence of your allegations.

    Explanation: First off, before reading this, do at least an hour of research on "Pleiadians," or "Plejarens." Also, "Reptilians," or as you know, the "lizard people." At the end, when they came down, they were all in black. They had blonde hair, in which the Pleiadians have. YOU all know them as "angels," but that is not quite what the Pleiadians are. What was that when they came out of those physical bodies? Those were LIGHT bodies/spiritual bodies, and they also had wings, because a higher dimensional form (depending on which dimension) has greater wings. Once again, depends on how powerful. They took them off to a planet. Possibly in a higher dimension.

    NOTE: Even my Christian sister, who used to go to church ALL of the time, mentioned to me about the fields, or wheat fields. I had no clue what she meant, but it was something in the bible. The children were running in wheat fields at the end.

    In veridical facts, when they DO come down, the race in which comes down first, will be the Reptilians (most likely, because I heard in the bible the False Prophet comes first), and they shall appear as Pleiadians, but shall not be.

    Now, ask yourself... Ok, I comprehend when it says Jesus will come back, but do you seriously believe he, PERSONALLY/PHYSICALLY has to come back, or just to send some form of angels? As much power as he has, as the most powerful in the universe (and God IS the universe) why would he need to waste his time to come? Yes, he shall be watching and listening for prayers... Also, I said waste his "time," in which I should not have said, for there is no way to define time, or if time even exists. I am telling what I have done research on. These are all my thoughts about 2012-2015. These are not facts, at least not in mind. Also, yes, I believe in God as my savior. No, I do not come from a science perspective, NOR do I come from a religious perspective, because I truly believe science and religion should be as one, just as all existence. What is the point of a one-sided, never ending battle? No solution comes from, except for nothing...

    One last point: God = Light. Everything in this universe is made of light. Therefore, God is the universe, and yes, there are different dimensional levels, as well as Heaven and Hell (two different dimensions, but one in the same).

    At the end of the movie, they came out of those bodies, and as I have explained, those were "light" bodies. In this sense, it would mean they would be the same as Jesus/God coming down, but NO, I don't mean PHYSICALLY/LITERALLY. Point is... all is made of light, and God is light, correct? So, basically, those light beings were he energy created from God, or the energy IS God. All the same... In which is another form of God/Jesus coming as a savior.

    END: Don't ask me, "Who the fuck do you think you are by saying all of this bullshit, you asswipe?"

    WHO do "I" think I am?

    I am who I am.
    I am what I am..
    I am that I am...

    No, I am not that you think I am...
    ^_______________________________^
  • Anon
    The Universe is made of light? Are you fucking kidding me? Nothing will happen in 2012. Your entire post is horse shit.
  • jay
    Your posting had good potential...but it was poorly written; out of sequence, incomplete points etc...
  • Vergil_Sparda's Son...
    And no, they probably would NOT need a space ship. Also, teleportation/time travel depends on the dimensional level or level of power one has... So, once again, they could be False Prophet. YOU decide...
  • destiny
    Being a 13 year old this day in age, thisfilmhas sent myhead spinning with the whole aspect of life.Showing me how the world was formed towards the end in the Garden of Eden sent my head spinning
  • pepzkie
    I liked the movie! I didn't have any single clue what the movie was about before I watched it. I didn't expect that it would give me a lot of thinking of what was the movie trying to convey.
    We all have different opinions on the movie based on what we believe in. As a Christian, I can relate the movie to my faith. Indeed, it is not the end...our physical death here on this earth is not the end of everything... That God will give us eternal life if we only believed that His Son, Jesus Christ died for us and if we will have a personal relationship with Jesus, leading us to Christ-likeness. We all have different interpretations on the movie. It is really up to us on what kind of message do we want to get and learn from it. I'm just glad I was able to watch it! =)
  • Kyo
    To a person who has always avoided science fictions... This was good... good and scary! I had a nightmare last night about this movie. I have to be honest; I'm not overly religious so I saw that little "judgement day" thing at the very end as too harsh...
  • Psionic
    Maybe God or Aliens is just wishful thinking and when the world ends it will just end and we will all die.

    As for whether it is christian propganda or naturalistic does it matter? Either way its the same outcome....we are saved.

    Maybe the original bible writers mistook Aliens for Angels or maybe they understood that they were 'not of this world' and that is what an Angel is.

    Im inclined to agree that God is the universe and light.

    This movie just leaves questions that cant be answered....the nature of truth and belief. I can live with not knowing.....

    p.s. im fed up of all this Christian endtime stuff what about other religions...? Oh wait they all get it!!!!

    and the 2012 mayan prophecy is crap all they did was map out a complete cycle of the sun and it just happens to end in dec 2012.

    The only good point that the movie made was that if disaster strikes the world is not prepared and that we rely to much on technology.

    Plus we are actually in danger from the sun and a solar flare could weaken the ozone...
  • Satreed
    honestly i think it was the worst movie i hav seen in years. i mean wat was the point of the whole movie if they couldnt even make a single change.
    everyone died and and they couldnt even save a single life.
    and wat about the kids. if they just take them to a place with trees does that just make things better. i mean they have to worry about food and everything.
    plus they are just kids so they have to start over from the beginning. i dont even think they know how to make a fire. in my opinion the movie sucked, BIG TIME... bt thats just me.
  • LR
    I (Catholic) just saw this movie with a good friend (former Catholic, now atheist) and we both liked it! Where he saw space ships, I saw transportational light. Where I saw wings on beings of light, he saw aliens and absolutely no wings. In other words, we looked at the same things on the screen and interpreted them as we wished/believed. We agree on a couple of things -- some of the scenes were waaaay too loud and the movie was entertaining. An entertaining movie. Period.
  • Stephanie
    When I originally went to see this movie, I had absolutely no idea what it was about. In fact, I was going with my boyfriend, and we had no intention of actually WATCHING this movie at all. As it turns out, we watched the entire thing, beginning to end, and absolutely loved it. This film evoked emotions in me that I didn't even know I had. I cried twice during the movie, once when the plane crashed and once when the boy had to leave his father behind ("But you said we'd be together forever!" Seriously, if that didn't tug at your heartstrings, there's something wrong with you!). I admit this movie did give me nightmares, more about the destruction scenes and the people running around on fire than about the angels though. And yes, they were angels. I absolutely loved this movie. It was beautiful and thought-provoking, and as long as you are a Christian, fairly realistic. I'm not sure I would have cared for this movie as much if he had been able to prevent the end of the world. God wanted to cleanse the world and start over with the children somewhere else. For those of you who didn't like the film, you probably prefer a happy ending where everyone lives and families get to stay together and live happily ever after. And to you, I say get real.
  • John 14:6
    Great Comments by the Reverent One and Michael (not sure if your name is actually Michael or if you chose that name because of the angel named Michael, but effective nonetheless)

    -I feel like the author and director certainly wanted this movie to be a religious message. However, they had to be subtle enough in their message to allow for the movie to be entertaining and thought provoking for poeple who aren't Christian. I felt like they did a great job of walking that line.
    -But, for someone who has an understanding of scripture, there were far too many parallels to ignore. I feel like the mistake some people make is in taking the events in the movie too literally. In reality, no one knows by what means God will take away His chosen, or how He will bring an end to this world. The way the movie played out is just the way the movie's creators chose to convey those ideas.
    -Ezekiel 1 speaks of 4 heavenly beings who have wings. I feel like there is no doubt that in the author's mind, the "aliens" are angels. In fact, it seems like the head angel could even be looked at as a representation of Jesus (I still haven't made up my mind about that, but it's a thought). But again, the creators of the movie had to leave another interpretation available for those who don't want to look at the movie in a religious way.
    -The spaceships can't be looked at literally be Christians. Again they are just the means that the author chose in order to walk that line and make the movie acceptable to multiple interpretations. But broadly speaking, the idea is that God is calling His chosen home (the rapture) before destroying the world.
    -Finally, the world that the children are transported to seems meant to represent the New Jersualem spoken of in Revelation 21. It is a second chance at the world that God wanted before the fall of Adam. The tree is the Tree of Life. And even though only those two children are present in that world, that doesn't mean that the author is ruling out the later arrival of all the deceased believers (but again, that would cross the boundary and make the movie obviously religious for those who don't want to interpret it that way).
    -Besides those main themes, the fact that Cage's father is a pastor, the way John 14:6 was incorporated in the final scene, and the last conversation between Cage and his father about how this isn't the end, makes it obvious that the movie was built around Christian ideas.

    All in all I felt like this movie was a great Christian message in a world that makes a wide reaching message very difficult to get out through the media.
  • Matt
    A lot of great ideas here in this thread. For starters, I'm a Christian... born and raised Catholic. I also believe in evolution and that science and religion are in fact, one. I'm afraid that a lot of Christians have these visions of heaven as this place in the clouds up in the sky where those of us who deserve to go enjoy the fruits of, well, heaven and finally learn about... everything. Who is God? Why are we here (or why were we there)? In essence, finally understanding all of the questions that we all ponder and, well, knowing:) I think the title of the movie is much more complex than how it comes off as simply knowing when disasters will happen.

    Anyway, my point... many Christians, or people in general regardless of religion, must forget that the people who apparently witnessed the events of creation, Jesus, angels, etc etc (all the good juicy stuff the Bible tells us about) lived off the land and road donkeys around. They didn't have the knowledge we have of religion, science and all the other great things we have discovered over the centuries. To many of them, religion hardly existed! So when 'angels' came down from heaven or Jesus performed a miracle, they described it best they could. If angels decended from a fireball and bright light in the sky, couldn't that mean some type of flying ship? Hell, picture Navy Seals being lowered from a helicopter with spotlights on it at night in Bethlehem around the time of Jesus. How do you think those people would describe something like that? Certainly not as Navy Seals coming down out of a helicopter! They probably would describe it as angels coming out of the sky from bright lights that's creating a hell of a lot of wind.

    Add some fairytale stuff to those depictions of religious events as the Bible does (face it hardcore Christians... the Bible was perversed by the Catholic Church... it didn't even exist before midevil times), and all of a sudden everything has to be miracles and beyond our comprehension.

    I look at it as this... religion IS science (as someone else pointed out). Science to people thousands of years ago was a religion. It was interpreted over the course of the last couple thousand years in a way for people to relate to it more, to give it a more human feel. If you had no understanding of modern technology and lived in a mud hut living off the land as people did hundreds and thousands of years ago, if a 'spaceship' were to come down and the 'people' told you not to listen to the snake and not to eat the apple, how would you describe that? There was no such thing as 'aliens' to those people. They had no comprehension that beings could in fact inhabit other worlds and be leaps and bounds ahead of them when it comes to technology. They didn't even know what technology is!

    To them, it was simply a MIRACLE! When these angels came to visit, they came from the clouds... from the sky. Hence the belief heaven must be up in the sky. They usually came with all sorts of bright lights, fireballs, etc. To modern man, sounds like a flying craft to me (UFO, spaceship, whatever... could have been a helicopter full of Navy Seals with dual parachutes... or 'wings'!!... lol).

    At the end of the day, I don't believe heaven is some spiritual place that only exists in some other puffy cloud dimension up in the sky. I believe in God, in Jesus, in angels and in Heaven. I just feel they're superior beings who just don't magically pop up wherever and whenever they want to, as many Christians would tend to believe. I believe heaven is a physical place (a planet out in the cosmos somewhere-- conversely, hell could very well be a planet too... one with serious volcanic activity... haha), God is in charge of heaven-- the center of our universe-- and oversees the rest of the universe. Did he magically just put us here with the snap of his fingers? I for one doubt that... probably more like sent some of his people (angels) out on a mission to find a suitable planet yes, in some sort of ship to travel from point-A to point-B. They found Earth, dropped a couple of beings in their form down for some prospecting and called them Adam and Eve and gave them a few rules and promised to check in from time to time. God checks up on us a lot, as the bible documents, and it's not by just seeing what we're doing in his head. It's probably by monitoring us with their technology... UFO's... spaceships... whatever you want to call it.

    Problem is now, we understand more about the potential existence of 'aliens' and for them to come down and talk to us would frighten us too much because of our understanding, or 'knowing'. Our knowledge and interpretation of what our ancestors have taught us about religion have closed our minds to the ideas that, yes, maybe supreme beings (aliens) are in fact the angels our ancestors speak of because, well, they didn't know how else to describe them!

    What I don't like to think about is the fact that we as a species can now play god. We've gone from horse and buggy to walking on the moon and exploring other planets with our technology in just 100 years. What's to say we won't be exploring other solar systems 100 years from now, manned mission, and we don't clone a couple humans (as we can now), drop them on a habitable planet and give them the same rules God gave us.

    Pretty scary thought. Know the whole bit about God taking a rib from Adam in his sleep to create Eve? Sounds like DNA cloning to me! If God was so powerful and magical, why would he need a rib from Adam? Couldn't he just snap his fingers and create a companion for Adam? My point is, there has to be a reasonable explanation for everything as I think this lesson of Adam and Eve clearly demonstrates.

    So I have it both ways, I'm a devout Christian that simply believes that God and his kingdom of heaven and angels just happen to be superior places and beings spiritually, physically and technologically. Nothing more, nothing less. If we're lucky enough to move onto that place we'll be blessed with finally understanding all that it is we as mortals question.

    One last parting note to twist a few more minds as I depart... remember how I said Heaven and Hell are probably physical places, planets just like Earth?

    Well, perhaps Earth is really Purgatory... where those who need to prove they're worthy to be accepted into God's kingdom of heaven are left to be judged (as the bible teaches us). Isn't that what all Christians do in this life?

    Just a thought:)
  • Matt
    I obviously just saw the movie based on my long drawn out post before this one... and I too felt a lot of it (while I was watching the film, especially toward the end as many have pointed out), got too far fetched. But the more I think about it, the more thought provoking it becomes. I'm beginning to realize it was a brilliant film.

    Maybe it's lesson is this... perhaps we as a species have gotten too far away from the teachings of God and have embraced technology to the point where our newfound and continuing understanding of universe 'scientifically' have taken us to a point that God never meant or wanted us to get to. That by doing so, we've started to crack the secrets and mysteries of the heavens and God himself. By 'knowing' and beginning to understand these things, we may in fact be threatening our very existence and survival.

    If you think about it, all that technology has done has taken us away from the teachings of God. Technology has caused wars, is used to attain material wealth, is used to oppress and govern others. As a byproduct, technology is destroying our natural environment... God's probably not too happy about that, either. Now we're playing God by cloning animals and if not already, eventually people. We use technology to disrupt the natural progression of life itself by saving lives with medical treatments, procedures and medicine. This is probably not at all what God intended us to do. Disrupting natural progression is in fact interfering with the will of God, is it not? If we believe in the teachings of the bible that is.

    Perhaps that's why many peoples around the world do not embrace technology... the Amish for example.

    Maybe with the progression of technology, we're understanding more of God's secrets and will eventually physically encounter his realm by exploring the heavens and further disrupting the progressional will for us that God intended.

    I'm starting to believe that's exactly what the film is leading us to believe. I mean, why forecast all of the disasters? Did anyone stop to think that it wasn't just forecasting, but pointing out what all it is that God is not happy with us about? All of the disasters we're arguably a result of our technology... and God intended for those disasters to happen as a lesson for our insistence in further advancements in science and technology... for us understanding and 'knowing' too much and using those advances and knowledge to benefit some and oppress others. By not learning from those lessons and further continuing to understand more, that he has to ultimately bring it all to an end... armageddon, if you will.

    God won't snap his fingers and wipe us all out in that event, a disaster on a scale of killer solar flares (as the movie depicted), a super-nova, earth killing asteroid impact, super volcano or nuclear war will be the way he perhaps brings it to an end. Those events would be the result of a snap of God's fingers.

    In the film, why did God only save the young children and not let Nick Cage go with them? Because children are innocent. They don't know any better... they don't use technology to exploit themselves or God's teachings. In the end, those that do, had to face the consequences. Adults, basically.

    The film raises a lot of questions and is certainly controversial... but I for one have found it to be extremely thought provoking and teach some very important underlying lessons.

    At the same time, well hey, maybe like Cage said in the movie, he just believes sh*t just happens. Maybe our own imaginations have gotten us into debating these topics. Who knows.

    Guess it's just a matter of faith and again, I believe in faith and in God. Just believe there's a logical explanation for it all and by beginning to understand that explanation, or 'knowing', it could be detrimental to our very survival.

    I'm gonna sleep well tonight.
  • Matt
    Quoting Jane Doe above: "Aliens know the future, whisper it to kids, and act like some creepy perverts looking through bedroom windows at night ?!?! Once again, you gotta be kidding me!"

    What about angels that know the future, visit people in their bedrooms at night and whisper to them (much less looking through their bedroom window!), look over our shoulders (guardian angels), take people momentarily into the heavens to warn them of impending danger or to enlighten them in the teachings and will of God (alien abduction, anybody?)?

    Have you seen an angel? Sounds like your quote describes what we (Christians) believe to be angels in not so flattering terms.

    I think you're missing the point of the movie. The aliens are not aliens, they're actually angels. If you look at it in that light, the movie will make more sense.

    Furthermore, throughout history, the art and paintings of our ancestors usually ALWAYS depict some kind of craft in the heavens when portraying angels or God. Why would that be? Could it be they're depicting their means of transportation? That's all debatable, but the fact is those images do exist and they do depict strange things in the sky accompanying the angels or God. It's what they saw or what the artist understood those events as happening based on the descriptions of the people who witnessed those events. It HAS to be something to it. There HAS to be an explanation.

    Why is it that the idea that those objects described by our ancestors could be the means the angels traveled to us? Yes, UFO's. All alien means is anyone who does not belong in the environment in which they are found. If an angel appeared to me in my bedroom glowing with wings floating above my bed, I would most certainly call that alien!

    I think part of the point of the movie is, the 'aliens' are angels. It seems everyone has the images of angels Michaelangelo portrays in his art as what they're supposed to look like.

    God even says in the bible, angels walk among us, unknowingly to us. They're not going to be dressed in white togas barefooted with big fluffy wings on their backs and a seemingly gold ray of light circling their heads. We'd be able to point them out in a heartbeat otherwise, duh. They'll take on our form, only communicating with those that won't freak out and wind up in a mental hospital. IE-- children, in the case of this movie.

    But hey, that's just my two cents. I like to think with a healthy dose of common sense.
  • inge dinia
    the movies was awsome
    i realy wanna watch more and more
  • I enjoyed it, still think about it from time to time.
  • Voreball
    Proyas pokes around our existential questions again. Mixing bible, ufos and sci-fi references, sowing seeds of controversy. The Garden of Eden reminds me of Shell Beach and The Earth is left behind like the Dark City. Caleb and Abby are not alone there though, with the others kids: Mr Hand and the Strangers will come back during their sleep! - Thanks for the trip Alex!
  • in time
    You guys are all torn about these angels/religion//rapture thing... for me, the best message of this movie is not about religion and angels and end of the world, its about saying/showing love to people you care for before its too late and that theres always hope..
  • Sinisha
    i Thought this was a movie about Illuminati but thena again who am i...
    look it up
    project lucifer
    you tube
  • Todd
    I think if you take a literal approach it falls apart when comparing to scripture. God promises that there will be a period of accelerated birthing pains for the earth coming up to the end times and that those that are believers will be gathered up before the end. And it further teaches that Jesus establishes himself as ruler on earth for a 1000 years.

    This film does a great job of showing an afterlife and I think is fair at portraying John's father, the pastor, as knowing his destination. It also gives us hope as God is in control and wants us to have that assurance.

    Where it does fall short is from a purely Christian message as some have thought. It does not talk about God's grace thru His son nor does it mention anything about who will be together in the afterlife.

    But, I still liked it and think it could be an excellent basis for some meaningful conversations with those wanting to know the whole truth.
  • Nutmeg
    Hubby and I just watched Knowing last night. It was riveting and I found some of it riveting and also disturbing ( which I usually like in a movie) I am in this " all things must have a happy ending" frame of mind right now simply because some crappy stuff has happened to us lately and I need to think happy thoughts so the stress doesn't make me crazy (er) Anyhow I both loved and hated the movie. But I have to say I didn't find it as fascinating until I read the comments in this forum. So many interesting viewpoints, some brilliant thoughts. You all made me think , and no not in a bad way! LOL
  • Jan Wandelaar
    I don't think the film adhered to any one religious group's ideas about the end of the world too tightly. It touched on some different ideas and story lines from different groups (to include Catholic, Protestant, Mormon as well as Naturalist, New Age, Scientology, and even some Buddist and Hinduism) but then moved on, maybe so as to not be accused of promoting any one group over another.

    I think that if someone weren't a student of multiple religions they would miss much of the story and it would begin to seem lame. It would be like watching a foreign film without the subtitles. You might get some of the story line but miss most of the depth of meaning and feeling associated with just the raw events passing by on the screen.

    I fear many of the respondents have missed much of the story. I really enjoyed the film as it traveled through these different religions and philosophies. It was packed with imagery and references that were enjoyable to see portrayed on film.
  • fred
    wow. i didnt get any of the religion stuff these people are tlaking about. aliens = angels. man, i dont know. i think some folks think too much. but i agree with the chick who hated it and loved it. i was kinda hoping for a happy ending. and at the end, i didnt feel so good. and i think the funniest thing about some of these people is they think we're in 'trouble' with somebody, god whatever, for "destroying the planet". like we can do that. i only hope we survive long enough for those dopes that have been "alien abducted" by the religion of global warming will all be "taken", or converted. or just start maybe analyzing the data, back-testing it. from a non physics-centric perspective. i think we might make it, as the over/under on that little scam is about 5-10 more years. just think, some day down the road, looking back on the redicoulsness of it. our kids will be like "what the hell were you people thinking?". yeah i know. but remember, we elected a guy for president who never had a real job too, and said he was cutting the deficit while spending more printed fake money in the history of man that he didnt have. so ya know, we were kinda in a group-nuts phase.
  • Just me
    Great movie...if it could make a teenage boy say that it has made him want to change his life for the better.....it has done a great job. I saw God in it ...period....as I see God in many things which may not necessarily be over the top spiritual....I think it was inspired.
  • Steve
    I have to agree with greg, They are Aliens, not angels!
    Religion has nothing to do with it or God.
    why did they have to travel in a space ship if they were angels? Again, the way I interpreted that was angelic spirit beings described in the Bible are really highly evolved creatures.

    There is no God without evidence !

    please seek help, i know everybody has been told there is a god because when you die, your dust.

    The end.
  • Datruth82
    Quick one: while the movie may pull it's source material from portions of the Bible, it slipped on one big issue: the Bible says that the earth will never be made to totter/wobble/end, and Ps. 37:10,11 tell us that the meek shall inherit the earth.

    So, if the physical earth were destroyed, what would be left for the meek to inherit?

    Here's the deal: in ancient Hebrew and Greek you had one word to mean more than one idea. The word 'earth' could represent the physical earth or 'the world' in terms of the populace of mankind. The latter form of the word is used when the Bible talks about the destruction of 'earth'.

    So, true to Ps. 37:10, 11, the Bible actually says that wicked mankind will be destroyed, while the physical earth itself will remain in place for the meek to inherit.

    That's where the Garden of Eden comes back in to place (and where the movie pulls its ending from). In the Bible, the instruction was given to subdue the earth and turn it into a paradisaic place to live like Eden, i.e., expand Eden beyond its then-current borders.

    If you study the Bible from top to bottom, you quickly realize that this original purpose of making the entire earth a paradise for mankind never changes. It's this idea of mankind being given a chance to complete that original purpose that marks this movie's end. Too bad it was on the wrong planet. :)
  • steve
    good point Datruth82, I will have to research this more and start reading the bible. You know, the bible also mention that the whole world was flooded but it wasn't true. However, there was parts of the world that did get flooded.

    I guess to them it was the whole world.

    Your the first that said something to me without any negative feed back... hmmmm.


    Thanks for the education!

    Steve :)
  • Laura
    Knowing was a great movie but not at all what i was expecting. Not a movie to watch if your afraid of death or the end of the world. I saw this movie as an action mmovie but it was surprisingly scary and suspensful. 5 stars!!
  • you guys are dumb.
    here's a list of all the stupid people on this website with no life.
    1.GREG
    you think too much. its a damn movie, your probably 40 sitting in a bathrobe waiting for people to disagree with you.

    2.NICK CAGE
    obviously you are a fattie because you talk about food. and you have absolutely no tase in movies.

    3.ATOMIC POPCORN
    your justa jerk because you stole matthew's picture, so you already suck.

    4.JANE DOE
    have you waited all your life to write a review on this?damn you wrote a book!


    REVERENT ONE is the only cool commenter on this website(:
  • diamond_fire100
    you guys are dumb---- witheaut being soo rude :) i agree with you! I don't know how many of you read about it or heard but the most realstic fact that we know right now is that so called aliens are light beings such as angels. So my opinion is that the movie interpreted it the most realistic way possible. This is my opinion and don't mind if anyone has a different one as long as they can bring proof. As one proof i tell you to read of the Saint Mary of Guadalupe showing in Mexic a lot of years in the past where had beem spotted ufo's in the same time and repeated days after her dissapearance. This is just one interesting fact. The real truth will probably know in time. Untill then i wish you all to see only quality movies with great actors such as N. Cage. Please excuse me if i made mistakes english isn't my national language.
  • dingle
     Do unto others as you would have other do unto you. Be polite and courteous at all times. Remember that you’re not communicating with a computer screen but with a human being who has thoughts and feelings just like you. So, always think of the person on the receiving end of the messages.
     Do not TYPE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS for emphasis. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING. If you need to emphasize a word, use asterisks, like*this or lines like_this_.
     Remember that the written word is hard to interpret. When you speak to someone, that person can heat the tone of your voice. If they can see you, they can take visual clues form your face and body to understand your meaning better. All of this is list in text, and sometimes responses can come across as mean or rude, even when you did not intend them this way. This is the reason some people use emoticons (visual clues) in their e-mails; it saves a lot of confusion.
     Be careful not to use rude or bad language online. Many providers will terminate you account.
     Don’t break any laws. When you’re on the net, follow the same rules of behavior that you would in real life. Remember, if it is against the law in the real world, it is against the law in cyberspace.
     Be universal. Other users have different Web browsers, different online services, different e-mail programs, etc. So don’t, for example, send out e-mail with text formatting—boldface, italics, indentations, etc.—because many other programs will not be able to read the formatting, and the recipients will receive your e-mail filled with muddled codes.
     Be brief, whenever possible. No one wants to read through a lot of unnecessary information. If you are replying to an e-mail, try editing out unimportant information and anything that is repeated.
     Don’t flame. Do not send rude or offensive e-mails or postings. It is bad manners and can get seriously out of hand (flame wars). So don’t flame others, and, if you are flamed, do not respond; you will never win. If you are flamed in forum or chat room, or, if you receive hateful e-mail, let your parents or teachers know.
     Always identify yourself. If your parents require you to use an online name instead of your real one, that’s fine—use your online name constantly. Never send e-mail without including your name at the bottom of the e-mail. Similarly, don’t post forum messages without identifying yourself; this is seen as rude.
     Make a good impression. Remember that written word is the only way you can represent yourself online, so spelling and grammar count. If you are going to be writing a large amount of text for other people to see, make sure you break it up using paragraphs; it will make it easier on the eye for those that will read it.
     Be patient with newcomers. Once you have become an Internet expert, it is easy to forget that you started out as a newbie, too. Learning the rules of cyberspace is much like learning a new language; it takes practice and including mistakes. So, if you come across someone else’s mistakes on the Net, don’t put them down; just politely point them in the right direction for guidance (send them a copy of these rules to get them started on their way!).
  • Lizb
    This movie i believe can be looked at many ways...... It depends on how you yourself portray it...... When i seen the end all i could think about was these whispers weren't Aliens persay but angels and the kids at the end were taking up in what christians and myself believe to be what they call rapture...... In other parts of the movies u seen Nicholas Cage in front of the Angels then they showed him their real image thats when he blacked out, i always heard when angels show their true selves people cant handle it just like in the bible when Angels showed their true form...... The children then were then taken to the new Earth...... Im a christian so i always look to my lifestyle as to what i portray a ending to a movie or a book might actually be telling me........
  • Seeker
    Well this movie goes to show the 'Pleiadians' - (whisper people/alien/angel beings) The Supermodels with blonde hair etc in this galaxy and i ain't bullshytting ya. These beings are real. Movies and popular fiction are just another subtle way of revealing the hidden truth in this human society. Whatever that means. And it's not just movies out nowadays, it's books, video of ufo sightings, billy meiers,the ufo disclosure not that long ago and whatever else. But i am seriously sick and tired of just reading books and watching videos about this stuff I am fed up I just want to see them appear to us infront of the world. There is no harm in that since alot of people have already claimed to have seen them personally, but all else it's kept private. If the pleiadians want to send us a message then make a big Landing already.
  • Bradford Lad
    Probably the best film i've seen,gripping, thought provoking stuff and no cop out at the end.Brilliant acting from all involved.Seen a few Proyas films and have enjoyed them all but Knowing is exceptional.5 stars !!!
  • StK
    Research Sumerian mythology. I'm not trying to plant anything in anyones minds as others try. Do your own research.
    Have a nice day.
  • I agree wat Greg Said..why would you believe in aliens. on the other side. The Creator of the Film was not aware in the likeness of God.
  • RE
    If this is just a movie for you then why are you making such a big deal of it?
  • RE
    I think it was a happy ending. When the two kids [supposingly to be like Adam and Eve] were in a beautiful environment. The world was going to burn anyways. It wasn't the people's fault that they were going to die so you would think they'd go to heaven. If they go to hell they deserve it. One thing though.. Even if Caleb and the other girl grew up,have a baby, and the baby grew up, how would the baby reproduce? The child can't do anything to the father
blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Atomic Popcorn

          Follow us on Twitter    Follow us via RSS    Follow us via Email