<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title> &#187; cloverfield monster</title> <atom:link href="http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/tag/cloverfield-monster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>A Cloverfield sequel in the works?</title><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/</link> <comments>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:52:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Atomic Popcorn</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloverfield]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cloverfield 2]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cloverfield monster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[michael stahl]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/?p=269</guid> <description><![CDATA[The guys over at Shocktillyoudrop have a interview of sorts with Michael Stahl-David of Cloverfield fame. They chat mainly about things pertaining to the upcoming release of the anticipated DVD. But they of coarse, as any genius would do, asked about the sequel. Now before we get any ideas, do we want a sequel or [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe
src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=0&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe><p><img
class="alignleft" style="float: left;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2301/2263384536_b6fa6349ce.jpg?v=0" alt="Cloverfield Sequel" width="182" height="220" />The guys over at <a
href="http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=5721" target="_blank">Shocktillyoudrop</a> have a interview of sorts with Michael Stahl-David of Cloverfield fame. They chat mainly about things pertaining to the upcoming release of the anticipated DVD. But they of coarse, as any genius would do, asked about the sequel.</p><p>Now before we get any ideas, do we want a sequel or let it continue on in our minds for what it was? <a
href="http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/2008/01/18/cloverfield-review/" target="_blank">Cloverfield</a> was a great film and had an ending that, in my opinion, was well done and left you thinking about it for a few days after we left the theater.</p><p>With that said, I am sure someone will want to make a little extra cash off of this movie and create a sequel. I am sure it will be solid, but nothing like the original.</p><p>More can be found at the link above. What do you honestly think about this news? I think they should leave well enough alone. But they wont&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/a-cloverfield-sequel-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cloverfield Monster? For real? (seriously don&#8217;t look down if you don&#8217;t want to see it)</title><link>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/cloverfield-monster-for-real-seriously-dont-look/</link> <comments>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/cloverfield-monster-for-real-seriously-dont-look/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Gillman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloverfield]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cloverfield monster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[godzilla]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category> <category><![CDATA[monster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category> <category><![CDATA[real]]></category> <category><![CDATA[toy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/2008/01/08/cloverfield-monster-for-real-seriously-dont-look/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Alright, so it&#8217;s only (reportedly) a picture of the toy version, but it should still be what the damn thing looks like (apparently). That fiendishly sexy site MovieWeb got this picture from some guy I guess and they also claim the image was created by the art director for the movie. I guess I kind [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe
src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/cloverfield-monster-for-real-seriously-dont-look/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=0&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe><p>Alright, so it&#8217;s only (reportedly) a picture of the toy version, but it should still be what the damn thing looks like (apparently). That fiendishly sexy site <a
href="http://www.movieweb.com/">MovieWeb</a> got this picture from some guy I guess and they also claim the image was created by the art director for the movie.</p><p><span
id="more-124"></span></p><p><img
src="http://i17.tinypic.com/81hh9vt.jpg" /></p><p>I guess I kind of dig it. At least he looks mean and agile, unlike the whale monster that was all over the net. But at the same time he looks a little too &#8220;Godzilla &#8217;98&#8243; for me. At least there is no way in hell this movie could ever be nearly as bad as that foul, foul atrocity (or anything else written and directed by Roland Emmerich). It definitely has an &#8220;other-worldly&#8221; feel to  it, lending credence to the tag line &#8220;Something has found us.&#8221; Could this be an alien? Could there be more of them coming our way? Shit, that would suck.</p><p>What say y&#8217;all? Leave some comments. We&#8217;ll forward them to the producers. I promise.</p><p>***UPDATE***</p><p>According to <a
href="http://www.darkhorizons.com/index.php">Dark Horizons</a> (who are way sexier and I like better than MovieWeb) this image is NOT the monster. Sonofabitch!</p><p>I&#8217;m disappointed that we still don&#8217;t know, yet I am hopeful that it will be better than that thing. On the other hand maybe it IS the monster and they (the movie people) are straight up lying to us yo!  I guess we&#8217;ll know in ten days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atomicpopcorn.net/cloverfield-monster-for-real-seriously-dont-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk
Object Caching 358/394 objects using disk

Served from: www.atomicpopcorn.net @ 2012-02-10 15:39:34 -->
