rss
rss
Baltimore Screenings

The Worst Movies of 2008

Boy, 2008 was all over the map in terms of movies.  Most of them were torn down with varying degrees of critical hostility and, in the majority of those cases, the hate was justified.  From movies like 10,000 B.C. to The Happening, there have been some big stinkers among audiences this year.  What follows is my personal list of the ten movies from this year you should avoid at all costs, and if you have seen any of them already, then you have my deepest sympathies.  They are in descending order, with #1 being the absolute worst:

88_minutes0110. 88 Minutes - 88 Minutes was actually a movie I didn’t hate after my initial viewing, but as time went by and the more I though about it, I came to dislike it a lot.  Al Pacino, God bless him, is always a delight to watch on screen, but here he’s given material to work with that is just plain ridiculous (although not as ridiculous as that hairdo!).  Pacino plays criminal profiler Jack Gramm, who receives a call on his cell phone one day warning him that he has only 88 minutes to live.  Now, whereas most people would freak out and launch a desperate race against the clock to prevent such a thing from happening, Gramm seems not to care and casually carries on his discussion of a past murder case that may be connected to the threat on his life.  Does this guy have any idea how long 88 minutes is?  But Gramm walks through this movie as if he has all the time in the world, thereby taking away the time-crunch tension the plot presents.  But the most notable problem of 88 Minutes is how awful the writing is.  Let me share my favorite line of the movie: “I’m a forensic psychiatrist for the FBI!  Stop your car!”  Who says that in real-life situations?  Uh, that would be NO ONE!  But the screenplay essentially feels like it was scattered all over the floor by a gust of wind during the first read-through and when the producers were trying to get it back in order, they just said, “Oh, what the heck?  Let’s just film it like this!”  Plus, the film doesn’t even try to be interesting by aborting the notion of doing everything in real time, as it is 108 minutes long.  108 minutes of my life I won’t get back.  “Just give me more time,” Pacino says at one point in the movie.  Sorry, Al, but I have no more minutes to give here.

the-mummy-tomb-of-the-dragon-emperor-wii-019. The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor - “I really hate mummies!” Brendan Fraser exclaims well into the flashy, fast and downright terrible hunk-of-junk that is The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, and I have to say that the feeling’s mutual this time around.  Now, I actually was really entertained by the first two Mummy pictures. This third entry into the franchise, however, moves from scene to scene without the lubricating humor or excitement of the first two; plus, did I mention it was terrible?  The first half-hour was especially mind-numbing, replete with boring scenes of stale dialogue and unbearingly fake British accents.  Strike one:  the absolutely great Rachel Weisz has been replaced with Maria Bello, in what could be the worst performance of her career.  Strike Two:  Rob Cohen, the man behind such dreck as The Fast And The Furious and XXX, is in the director’s chair this time, and he handles the action sequences like Michael Bay would on his worst day.  Strike Three: those darned Abominable Snowmen, who look so fake that you just have to laugh at them – like much of the rest of the CGI in the film.  I would also criticize the exhausted plot devices, the film’s serious lack of emotion, and the just really all-around bad performances, but I’m all out of strikes.  From now on, the undead should stay dead.

theincrediblehulkster8. The Incredible Hulk - Fans wanted more action after Ang Lee’s 2003 film incarnation of The Hulk, and that’s precisely what they got in The Incredible Hulk.  However, there’s nothing really incredible about this version. It is deftly robbed of what little sense of character and story development that the Ang Lee version actually did have.  Style replaces substance in Louis Leterrier’s film and it in turn feels like a really bad video game.  The plot involves the teeth-gnashing General Ross (William Hurt) tracking the exiled Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) in order to extract some of Bruce’s DNA to manufacture an entire army of Hulk Soldiers.  The one glaring problem: what makes Ross think that he’ll have any control over this army once he creates it?  Because the entire point of Bruce hiding in Brazil is so that he can attempt to find a cure for the Hulk side of him that goes completely bonkers once unleashed. It’s not as if Ross doesn’t know -  I think the General needs to go back to the drawing board, as does Marvel Studios.  Marvel delivered one of the best superhero movies in recent years with Iron Man back in May, but a month later, they put this…thing in theatres.  They should have realized by now that The Hulk is their least interesting, least developable character and that any movie made about him will always be uneven.  In my opinion, Marvel has many better characters they could focus their attention on, and I personally hope that this is the last we see of The Hulk on the big screen, at least in his own movie.  C ‘mon, Marvel, just SMASH! the Hulk franchise already.

mammamia17. Mamma Mia! - I truly feel bad for anyone else who was dragged to the incessantly corny and nearly insufferable film adaptation of the stage musical Mamma Mia! This movie is so bad, not even the presence of the great Meryl Streep can save it.  You know, I absolutely loved last year’s big musical, Sweeney Todd, but whereas that film played like a smooth-flowing and hauntingly beautiful opera, Mamma Mia! instead plays out like a disjointed and bombastic karaoke night in Greece.  In addition, the songs are stretched out to the point where I felt like I was back in elementary school chorus on a really bad rehearsal day.  And the cinematography during the musical numbers certainly didn’t help, as that made the whole film feel like an overdone production of Riverdance. When the music is one of the worst things about a musical, you know something went wrong somewhere. Furthermore, Mamma Mia! manages to accomplish something that I thought no movie could possibly do, and that is it makes Meryl Streep completely and utterly bland.  Shame!  Shame on them!  And finally, the two shallow, giggly girlfriends portrayed by Julie Walters and Christine Baranski are the character equivalents of nails on a chalkboard.

fools-gold-movie-026. Fool’s Gold - I have a question: where is the chemistry that stars Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson allegedly shared on-screen?  ‘Cause I gotta tell you, after the horrible How To Lose A Guy In 10 Days and now the equally bad Fool’s Gold, I just ain’t seein’ it.  In fact, Fool’s Gold has everything going on EXCEPT chemistry between its stars. Not that any of what’s on the screen holds our attention for more than a minute.  It’s weird, because for a film showcasing underwater fights and high-speed sequences with motor scooters, Jet Skis and a prop plane, it all becomes unimportant – quickly.  There was a certain point I reached while watching Fool’s Gold where I just didn’t care any more.  And I find it ridiculous that the film expects us to suspend our disbelief so much that we swallow the notion that these two characters would willingly push aside their distaste for one another, as well as their recent divorce, just to go treasure salvaging.  I’ll be sure to keep that in mind if I ever have a really bad break-up with a girlfriend.  I can’t see any real reason why Fool’s Gold was made, except to show off tropical locations that can be used to check your watch in the dark and the intense tans of its stars.  You know they have to be spray-ons.

Four Christmases5. Four Christmases – The D.O.A. holiday comedy Four Christmases is full of jokes that stink worse than expired eggnog.  It’s movies like Four Christmases that demonstrate exactly how little Hollywood knows about making Christmas-themed movies that are actually good.  This alleged comedy is bursting at the seams with both slapstick and bathroom humor, and I have to say that Fool’s Gold is looking funnier and funnier by the minute.  All Four Christmases does is give us scene after scene of uninspired jokes that fall flat on their face, yet surprisingly keep trying to make us laugh.  Cue the baby vomit!   Vince Vaughn can definitely be funny, but here he’s given an abysmal script penned by four – count ‘em, four – writers that have no real sense of comedic timing.  I know what the producers of this piece of junk are getting in their stockings this year: lumps of coal.

Twilight4. Twilight – Vampirical lust meets teenage hormones in Twilight, and the end result makes you want to search for a wooden stake.  Twilight is the romantic horror phenomenon for teenage girls these days, and I don’t doubt that the millions of them who’ve seen it by now were more or less satisfied with what they got.  Everybody else who sees it, though, will think it’s laughable, slow, badly acted and B-O-R-I-N-G!  I actually had the misfortune of reading the book as well, and let me tell you that compared to this film, the book is far more bearable – but that’s not saying much.  Really, NOTHING happens in the first hour and a half, but when things finally pick up in the last half hour, it’s far too late to salvage whatever potential this thing ever had.  I blame author Stephenie Meyer for this, because the book had a similarly nonexistent plot.  And when the villains of the story come in toward the end, you just can’t help but laugh because the only way to recognize that these people are the bad guys is that they walk in that super-cheesy slow motion while sneering at the good guys. They’re about as intimidating as regular teens who are mad at their parents for grounding them.  Add on top of that the fact that stars Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson have ZERO chemistry together, and you’ve got the ingredients for one of the dopiest movies of the year …and in case you can’t tell by now, I hated this movie.

speed-racer-logo3. Speed Racer – No, Speed, no!  Alright, I can appreciate that The Wachowskis (Matrix Trilogy) were trying something unique and different with Speed Racer, but what I absolutely can’t appreciate is the end product:  CGI run amok, a hyperactive, bubble-gummish mess that moves so fast, you’d think everybody involved in the production was on speed themselves.  Fortunately, I didn’t waste any money on Speed Racer in theatres, as I saw it via Netflix, but let me tell you that the experience would have been just as mind-numbing on the big screen.  And don’t get me started on Speed’s little brother and his pet monkey…in fact, now that I think about it, it was the monkey that gave the most tolerable performance in the entire movie.  In the year 2008, did Warner Brothers really expect us to be impressed solely by CGI, which in this case makes the film look all the more cartoonish and serves the sole purpose of trying to cover up the film’s paper-thin story.  And it seems theater crowds shared my sentiments.  For all I care, Speed can keep on driving his race car right past the Finish Line until he reaches the Land of Story and Character Development.

10000bc2. 10,000 B.C. – Talk about a train wreck of historical proportions – oh my God!  This obviously inaccurate “historical epic”, if you could call it that, is so bone-headed, cliche-ridden and downright laughable that you’d think it was written by Neanderthals.  The plot is so mired in exhausted plot conventions it wouldn’t be able to stay afloat if thrown a life raft.  And without a life raft, the story has its characters take what feels like a disjointed trek through an issue of National Geographic.  One minute, they’re in snow-covered mountain terrain; next they’re in a thick jungle and, finally, they arrive in a barren desert.  You know, I would’ve loved to see the location shooting sites on this film.  Now let’s see, what’s a writer to do in order to salvage whatever credibility hasn’t been sucked dry by this movie?  Stage both a slave AND mammoth revolt!  If there was any upside to 10,000 B.C., I guess it was that after watching those creatures that look like a cross between a raptor and a turkey, I didn’t feel so bad at Thanksgiving.  Seriously, cave paintings are looking more and more entertaining by the minute.

11. You Don’t Mess With The Zohan – So, what could be worse than vampire stare-offs, CGI on meth and the stupidest Neanderthals ever put on film?  The answer: an Israeli commando who dreams of becoming a hair stylist.  Talk about stranger than fiction!  I’ll openly admit to never being a fan of the Adam Sandler schtick, but it is at its worst in You Don’t Mess With The Zohan, the lowest point of Sandler’s career that’s made even more unwatchable by the painfully fake accents and the typical Sandler humor. That by itself is so tired out by now, it’s hard to feel a pulse.  Whoever thought a decent movie could be made from this concept needs to have his authority to greenlight movies permanently revoked.  Not five minutes into the film I said “You’ve got to be kidding me,” because the attempts at stringing bad jokes onto a thread of Israelis and hummus are astronomically uninspired.  Not once did I even begin to crack a smile; I was too busy staring at the screen in utter disbelief and revulsion.  And what makes this even more sad is that this marks the second consecutive year that an Adam Sandler comedy has had the dishonor of appearing at the bottom of my year-end list.  You Don’t Mess With The Zohan is the cinematic equivalent of dry-heaving; you’re empty but really feel sick, and that feeling stays with you no matter how hard the convulsions wrack you.  The title says that you don’t want to mess with The Zohan, but quite frankly, who would even care to?

Now, if any of my picks upset anyone in any way, I apologize – but keep in mind that these are my own personal choices.

If anyone wants to argue with me, I’m willing to defend myself.

And be sure to stay on the lookout for my forthcoming list of the Best Films of 2008, where I count down my personal choices for the year’s top ten films.

  • Jc
    The Incredible Hulk and The Mummy 3 on a worst movie list which makes no mention what so ever of Disaster Movie or Meet the Spartans? Is this a joke? I only ones that I agree with were that I've seen were 10,000 B.C, Speed Racer, and Fool's Gold. And While Zohan was definitely Adam Sandlers worst comedy thus far, it still wasn't near as bad as Mike Meyers The Love Guru (which really sucked plus it had Justin Timberlake in it; gay).
  • The ones you listed, Jc, are movies I didn't even bother seeing. Most of these I was either dragged to or actually saw willingly. This list is based off the movies I saw this year; not the ones that others did and hated. Like I said, they're my personal choices.
  • Sarah
    Michael, it seems like you don't even like movies, so excuse my bluntness, why are you even rating them. Generally critics have a lot of experience in what they are rating. If this is your idea of the worst movies list then maybe you need to expand the list of movies you haves seen. True you happen to have seen some truly tragic movies, but you also must criticize them in category because most of these movies are under very different categories, and you seemed to use the same type of scale for all of them. So my advice to you would be to watch more movies and try and go in with a positive mind set, not shit I'm being dragged into another movie. Then revise your list for the worst movies of 2008. You may try adding Baby Mama and War, Inc to the list.
  • Thanks for the reply Sarah - why don't you come write for us! I am sure Michael will add in his two cents soon!
  • lucidreamer
    i'll write for you. how do i get to write ? pithy, timely comments on today's cinematic offerings are yours for the taking. do not pass up this opportunity.
  • Nathan
    Sarah, I'm sorry and I know you basically started out by saying your going to go on a rant, it was highly unneeded. Michael did spend a great deal of time on this and whether or not he had been willingly dragged or not those movies he had list are in his general opinion the worst movies of 2008. Is it far off?No, RottenTomatoes averages on these movies put most of the at the Top 20 worse this year. There is a point when its constructive criticism and then a point where you are simply taking pride out of ones work. I'll can take constructive criticism but to see another staff writer get baggered because he hasn't seen all movies is a bit ridiculosis in my mind, especially if its in his opinion.
  • OK, guys, I clearly stated that this list is of movies I thought were horrible BASED ON MY OWN OPINION and NOT anybody else’s. True, there must have been worse movies this year, but I didn’t take the time to see trash like “Disaster Movie” or “The Love Guru” because I had better ways to spend my time.

    Sara:

    How dare you say that I don’t like movies? I LOVE movies; movies have been my one true passion ever since I can remember, and they are something I take extremely seriously. And since I take film seriously, I think I’m definitely in a position to offer my thoughts on them. Most other critics out there usually don’t have any idea what they’re talking about, so film criticism is always in need of people who DO have a knowledge of the subject and can form well-rounded opinions. I have years worth of experience in this field, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what I’m talking about here.

    You say I need to expand the movies I see. How about I give you a complete list of the movies I’ve seen from 2008 so far just so you can see exactly how different they all are. Right now, I’m catching up with the more Oscar-worthy films so that I can make a good Best Of The Year list. I’ve seen everything from big-budget blockbusters to comedies to smaller films this past year, so until you have a better understanding of the types of films I see regularly, you can’t even begin to criticize my taste in movies.

    I do judge different movies based on different merits, but if a certain film is just plain awful, then I have no hesitation in placing it on lists such as this one (”The Mummy 3″, “The Incredible Hulk”, “Twilight”.) Plus, this is a culmination of the year’s worst movies in general. Not by action standards, not by comedic standards, but by the basic standards of judging every movie.

    Next time, might I suggest not being so quick to jump to conclusions.
  • John Wayne
    This is too funny. Having to defend yourself as a critic is not what a critic does.

    I just removed this site's bookmark which i had visited semi-regularly.
  • One of the dumbest comments I have heard yet this week.
  • RESIN
    I absolutely agree with the list above. I feel sorry to the people that watched all of those movies. That is some time in your life that you're never going to get back.

    I'm a huge Sandler fan but I was really appalled how bad Zohan was. It even featured my crush Emanuelle Chiriqui.

    Twilight on the other hand was really boring. Me and my gf watched the movie on a its first Friday weekend and the house was filled with teenagers. I was literrally bored to death but my gf loved it LOL (we both didn't read the book). Add to the fact that the teenagers were screaming whenever the guy appears on screen LOL.

    But I'd put 10000 BC on top of my list.
  • melanie
    you know half of them movies were boring but i disagree with twilight because twilight was a really good movie and yes people are intitled to their opinion but that movie made more money than most movies out there pus the fact that the cant make movies exactly like the book or the movie would be so long for that fact twilight was amazing!
  • LeeTeeBin
    Ummm are you kidding!?!?!?!?!?
    Are you really saying this is the worse movies of 2008. Okay lets set something straight Hollywood lost it touch with comedy, Adam Sandler could of done wayyyyy better but in my opinion You Dont Mess with the Zohan is better most of the comedy movies that came out 2008. Incredible Hulk was wayyyy better then all those movies on the list actually it shouldnt even be on that list.
  • Backlash
    Niiiiiiiiiice !!!
    One of the best " Worst Movies" list I've seen for 2008. You should really expand it to include:
    The Happening, which in fact should've been called The Nothing's Happening.
    The Love Guru, the worst one yet from Myers, who is even less funny than Sandler.
    The XFiles-yet-another-senseless-back-stab-at-the-TV-series (a.k.a. "I Want To Be Leaving...")
    Meet The Spartans and Disaster Movie (as someone mentioned before) yet 2 more movies trying to jump on the same train as the original Scary Movie (which in turn was already trying to jump on the train of The Naked Gun series of movies, which in turn were trying to jump on the train of Flying High, which in turn....you get the idea)
    Jumper,.. I actually could only just watch about 15 minutes of this nonsense
    Meet Dave....I want my money back !!!
    Star Wars - The Clone Wars, What an appropriate name for yet another tasteless sequel !!
    The Day the Earth Stood Still...more like the movie where Keanu Reeves Stood Still, again, for the whole movie..
  • Dizz
    Jumper was a great movie it was not boring at any part the only stupid thing is that how he got his powers but the production was fantastic.
  • Jane
    Whilst I do not object to many of the explanations and films you have put up, I must point out that these reviews are entirely based on your standard of good.

    I'm not a huge fan of the sandler franchise either, but aren't lame jokes and vulgar humour what characterise the movie (and essentially what entice some people to go watch it)? Same goes for twilight. Cheesy as it may be, the film is targeted towards teenagers who love a good flick. I feel that it delivers fully in this sense.

    Anyway, that's my opinion. I appreciate how you've been able to write this list without insulting the actors personally though.
  • YJ Kim
    The list is incredibly foolish. I think there are at least 10 OTHER movies worse than the movies picked here. I disagree with this list 100%!
  • lucidreamer
    "...there ain't no good guy, there ain't no bad guy. we just DISAGREE na, na, na !...".
    always loved that song. anyhow i agree with you he was out to lunch on most of that list.
  • Andi
    people who dont like twilight are on crack. its not a VAMPIRE movie its a love story. who cares that its a vampire and a "mortal" Think Romeo and Juliet. I am 25 my boyfriend is 26 and we both liked the movie. Yes it was a badly acted- what do you expect from new actors? From what Ive heard neither have had a staring role. THe film had a small budget so it was - a low budget film.
    Its not the BEST acted movie I've seen but once you get past the expectation of seeing "Blade" or "Underworld" like action and acting, (new actors vs people who have been in the biz longer) then you can appreciate the movie more. It wasn't made to be about blood and guts and gore- the world is all about that and its sad- it's a love story period. Sorry to the people who dont get that.
  • Trevor
    Although I agree that you can state whichever movies you like or dislike, I sort of disagree with Twilight. And I am very happy you said the book was better; because it was. That's why I didn't like the movie, the book was so much better. Although, if you hadn't read the book, the movie would have been fantastic.
  • Corey
    Ok I have seen some of the movies that you listed and agree that they are bad but I have no context on which to judge your opinion like what are your top 10 movies and give us sample of some others that you watched.
  • FLAC
    About some of your picks: Twilight. What the hell is wrong with people nowadays? This "Twilight" franchise is looking to be worse than the Harry Potter craze. Everywhere I go I see girls ranging anywhere from 13 to 35 reading that stupid ass book, I go to the mall and walking by Hot topic (Not entering) I see all of the merchandise that this book and movie have spewed up. One shirt said "Real men sparkle". I mean what the fuck? I saw a preview for this movie and it said that "Twilight" was to be a bigger romance than "Titanic" was. Who the hell can compare some cheesy Vampire movie where the main characters do nothing but stare at eachother to an epic like "Titanic?" I completely agree with your comment on this flick.
  • Lorna
    I take it you've never read the book yourself then? Because it far outshines the movie. Which to a TEENAGE GIRL is a GOOD MOVIE. However, I'm not sure if I agree with the sparkling thing. That IS a bit wierd.
  • Lorna
    Oooh. I forgot to mention that I disagree with you on Mumma Mia and Speed Racer as well as my earlier comment on Twilight.
    What I don't think people get, is movies like Twilight, are based on books that were written for teens. So the movie, critiqued by a bunch of thirty or forty somethings, is seen as cheesy by those who are not teenagers. To yeah, 35-year-olds reading the book and loving it? that's fine. Adults with no personality reviewing the movie because they have too much free time? Not fine.
  • JoshM
    Wow he did say this is entirely HIS opinion....I don't know what the fuss is about. The thing i agree with is disaster movie and the other one. Those are the worst possible movies ever.
  • lucidreamer
    anyhow :

    88 minutes - not that great but ok.

    mummy - really good. best of mummy movies.

    the hulk - really good. better than iron man.

    momma mia - a really fun movie

    fool's gold - not so hot.

    four christmases - some really funny parts.

    twilight - great almost bloodless vampire romance.

    speed racer - not so hot.

    10,000 bc - really bad. sfx on the cheap.

    don't mess with the zohan - uneven but some really funny parts.
  • sophie
    i completely agree about the mummy movie they should of quit while the were ahead, i loved the first two. Rachel Weizs did a much better job
    i personally dont see what the big deal is with the twilight books the first book in my opinion excellent writing but a complete bore it was the same thing over and over with i want to be with you but i cant be with stuff like 200 pages of the same stuff
  • It's nice to hear someone say Twilight was boring who actually read the books. I haven't read the books nor seen the movies, they just look terrible all around. But I am not in middle school either!!
  • You're completely wrong on Speed Racer. I'm watching it right now on Blu Ray and it's extremely well done. The story is solid, the characters are well played by good actors, and the colors are brightly done to support the unique style.

    People should give it a try.
  • Manoj
    I was totally agreeing with you until I saw Zohan at #1!! What the heck?! That movie wasn't looking good in the first 5 minutes but became pretty funny later on. Haven't you been to New York before? A little sappy too, but not one of the worst films of 2008. And where was "The Day The Earth Stood Still"??? That definitely should have been on this list. Otherwise, pretty good job.
    P.S. I feel like Speed Racer could have been better if they took out the sappy romantic scenes and CHEEEESY jokes from the little brother
  • clyde
    Those are some of the best movies ever! Just because you are a sour old rotten prune with no sense of movies who think you are ! Going around insulting those movies !!! GO TWILIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • CARETAKER
    I HAVE TO DISAGREE ON ALMOST ALL OF THEM, TWILIGHT DID SUCK WAY TO SAPPY, BUT THE HULK AND ZOHAN THEY WERE HELLA GOOD, WELL MOSTLY THE HULK. IF YOU PAYED ATTENTION TO ANY OF THE COMICS OF CARTOONS THAT CAME OUT THE HULK WAS ALWAYS ON THE RUN AND IT HAD ITS SAPPY PARTS, BANNER NEVER BEING ABLE TO BE WITH BETTY. YOU MAY HAVE YOUR WORST LIST BUT MOST OF THESE MOVIES ARE ON EVERYONES GREAT LIST.
  • Nathan
    I'm sorry but I can't agree with anyone who is willing to say that Zohan was a good movie. The movie tried way too hard at times and I'm sorry but there is absolutely no humor in seeing Adam Sandler doing old ladies. I'm sorry, thats not funny at all. The Incredible Hulk in my opinion doesn't deserve to be on the Top 10 list but that being said it wasn't that great. Was it better than Ang Lee's Hulk?Yes, very much so but it wasn't that good. Most of the movie felt rushed in my opinion. I also think, Caretaker that you should rephrase your sentence, "ON EVERYONE'S GREAT LIST." Umm, I'm sorry but RT has this move docking around a 6% RT rating. Which means out of 140 something reviews only about 5 of those critics thought it was even worth watching. So, no its not on everyone's great list.
  • Kelli
    Actually half of those are amazing movies. I mean yea they might not be the best, but there definitely not the worst? And honestly I'm so tired of how people are bringing down twilight like that. Yea it wasnt as great as everyone made it out to be, and it could of been a lot better then it was, but it was adorable. Yea the book was a little better. but still. It's not that bad. and I'm guessing that most of these movies were ment more for the girls anyway?
  • 790
    Everyones has there favs'.
    Personally I loved Speed Racer, it was my pick for best film of the year. Beating out "The Fall", The Wrestler, and "Grand Torino".
    Also in my top 5, "The Hulk" was an amazing film!!!
    Norton won me back on his team with that performance!!!
  • EZRA
    THANK YOU FOR SAYING THAT ZOHAN IS THE WORST MOVIE OF 2008 BECAUSE, IT IS. IT'S THE WORST MOVIE EVER TO ME. PLEASE COMMENT BACK IF YOU AGREE.
  • Ashleyyy
    Okayy so I agree with most of those movies.
    Twilight though... well no
    Twilight is a love story with some action. Yes like Romeo and Juliet. It's aimed toward teenage girls (arnt most stories aimed at women?) i watched the movie first and thought it was pretty good (although i do hate kristen stewart shes a horrible actress hated her in catch that kid and so on) then i read the books and got hooked. But thats cuase I love love stories. everyones entitles to their own thoughts though.

    I SO AGREE WITH DONT MESS WITH ZOHAN it was terrible.
blog comments powered by Disqus